Richard has always been interested in the idea of time, and he believes textiles are an interesting material to communicate time. “When you look at fashion, for instance, fashion immediately communicates an era or a point in time. You can look at something and say it’s 70s inspired, 60s inspired. So there’s that perception of time in terms of culture and how you look at fashion.”
“If something’s been made by a machine or has been Jacquard woven, you know through experience that that is a quicker process than something that’s been made by hand.
“I also like the idea of this communication of the time. Quite often, my work is made in response to a specific moment. For example, I made a piece of work called five o’clock shadow, specifically in response to that idea of time. It’s my shadow on the floor at five o’clock, but it also communicates our idea of bodily time, when a man’s beard grows.
“I was really interested in sharing time, almost like little dots. So my processes use multiples of dots and lines and crosses, but the dots specifically are like punctuation. So they represent like moments of time like you would use a comma or full stop.”
Richard’s most famous work is ‘60’, five dozen variations of a stitched cube, each taking an hour longer than the one before. In its entirety, his cube collection represented over 1800 hours of work and was completed during the hours outside of his full-time job.
“It was a really epic project! I made it in response to the exploration of time and the magic number 60 that governs our lives. The whole piece is a reflection and investigation into this magic number 60. And then each of the cubes were 60 by 60; then I just kept on reusing this number and working in increments of 60.
“It was a physically and mentally quite draining project. If I was ever going to do it again, which I will not, is work the other way around. So I started at one and worked my way up to 60. And what I should have done was start at 60 and work down!”
“The result was these very abstract patterns of time on each cube, each one different, so you can see how I made them all as flat objects. When I transformed them into three-dimensional objects, they turned into something completely different and unintentional. I love that sort of randomness, but the randomness is contained within this cube, and that’s what’s really comforting.”